Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 310 Or. 393 (1990)

PETITIONS FOR Rev., 310 Or. 393 (1990), 310 Or. 393 (Or. 1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1990-09-18
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 310 Or. 393 (1990) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (798 P.2d 672)Oregon Supreme Court. September 18, 1990. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED Carrier v. Hicks (A60563) (S37366) (102 Or. App. 13) Department of Transportation v. Atlas Construction Company (A50779) (S37205) (101 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 310 Or. 393 (1990). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,310 Or. 393(1990)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(798 P.2d 672)
Oregon Supreme Court.
September 18, 1990.
ALLOWED
Carrier v. Hicks (A60563) (S37366) (102 Or. App. 13)

Department of Transportation v. Atlas Construction Company (A50779) (S37205) (101 Or. App. 245)

Department of Transportation v. Lundberg (A50223) (S37157) (100 Or. App. 601)

Elvin v. Oregon Public Employees Union (A50465) (S37333) (102 Or. App. 159)

Foland v. Jackson County (A63989) (S37270) (101 Or. App. 632)

Mazorol v. Coats (A50694) (S37382) (102 Or. App. 8)

State v. Counts, Johnny J. (A60040) (S37272) (101 Or. App. 439)

Washington v. Taseca Homes, Inc. (A48923) (S37271) (101 Or. App. 607)
DENIED
September 18, 1990
Bird, Rick v. Maass (A61793) (S37317) (102 Or. App. 274)

Branton, Stephen A. v. Maass (A61320) (S37321) (102 Or. App. 274)

Canell, Alvin H. v. Maass (A62598) (S37291) (102 Or. App. 274)

Canell, Alvin H. v. Maass (A62834) (S37292) (102 Or. App. 274)

Cohens, Nathaniel v. Maass (A61135) (S37294) (101 Or. App. 520)

Curtis and Curtis (A60951) (S37350) (102 Or. App. 252)

Delgado, Jesse v. Maass (A61481) (S37325) (102 Or. App. 274)

Donald H. Hartvig, Inc. v. Clackamas Town Center (A49514) (S36243) (101 Or. App. 79)

Fishman v. Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceutical, Inc. (A50111) (S37315) (102 Or. App. 123)

Garter Enterprises, Inc. v. Castle (A60641) (S37363) (102 Or. App. 373)

Harris v. Real Estate Commissioner (A61619) (S37344) (100 Or. App. 551)

Ives v. INA Life Insurance Co. (A50878) (S37241) (101 Or. App. 429). Fadeley, J., would allow.

Lockard and Lockard (A61413) (S37237) (101 Or. App. 451)

Lockard v. Lockard (A50659) (S37236) (101 Or. App. 451)

Scott, Ernest Ulysses v. Maass (A61799) (S37335) (102 Or. App. 274)

Searles v. Johnston Cement (A60531) (S37356) (101 Or. App. 589)

State v. Carpenter, Brian Keith (A50988) (S37303) (101 Or. App. 489). Fadeley, J., would allow.

State v. Dunham, Kevin Gerald (A61957) (S37358) (102 Or. App. 522)

State v. Klatt, Denise Michelle (A49658) (S37307) (101 Or. App. 676). Fadeley, J., would allow.

State v. Thornbloom, James Myron (A60881) (S37226) (101 Or. App. 520) Unis, J., would allow.

State v. Young, Ronald Dean (A62285) (S37319) (101 Or. App. 520)

UAC/KPTV Oregon TV v. Hacke (A50305) (A50302) (S37276) (101 Or. App. 598) Graber, J., would allow.Page 394
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩