Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 309 Or. 333 (1990)

PETITIONS FOR Rev., 309 Or. 333 (1990), 309 Or. 333 (Or. 1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1990-02-06
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 309 Or. 333 (1990) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (787 P.2d 887)Oregon Supreme Court. February 6, 1990. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED Honeywell v. Sterling Furniture Co. (A50296) (S36688) (99 Or. App. 94) Lowrimore v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 309 Or. 333 (1990). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,309 Or. 333(1990)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(787 P.2d 887)
Oregon Supreme Court.
February 6, 1990.
ALLOWED
Honeywell v. Sterling Furniture Co. (A50296) (S36688) (99 Or. App. 94)

Lowrimore v. Dimmitt and County of Marion (A50448) (S36705) (99 Or. App. 192)
February 22, 1990
Doe v. Portland Health Centers, Inc. (A50231) (S36755) (99 Or. App. 423)

Erickson v. Christenson (A49695) (S36703) (99 Or. App. 104) (Luther Memorial Church's petition)

Erickson v. Christenson (A49695) (S36763) (99 Or. App. 104) (American Lutheran Church's petition)

Fay v. City of Portland (A50271) (S36751) (99 Or. App. 396)

State v. Olmstead, Kenneth Dale (A50685) (S36654) (99 Or. App. 41)

Tolbert v. First National Bank of Oregon (A37591) (S36375) (96 Or. App. 398) (Tolbert's petition). Reconsideration allowed. Court's previous order of October 26, 1989 (308 Or. 466) denying review is withdrawn. Review allowed.

Tolbert v. First National Bank of Oregon (A37591) (S36376) (96 Or. App. 398) (First National Bank's petition). Reconsideration allowed. Court's previous order of October 26, 1989 (308 Or. 466) denying review is withdrawn. Review allowed.
(787 P.2d 888)
Yamaha Store of Bend Oregon v. Yamaha Motor Corp. (A44218) (S36613) (98 Or. App. 290)
DENIED
February 6, 1990
Dickinson, Todd E. v. Maass (A60453) (S36738) (99 Or. App. 386)

Easly v. Colby (A48682) (S36711) (98 Or. App. 535)

Hitchman v. Warren (A50295) (S36728) (99 Or. App. 242)

Livingston, Marshall Lee v. Board of Parole (A61133) (S36759) (99 Or. App. 592)

Lund v. Denco Transportation, Inc. (A60196) (S36760) (99 Or. App. 488)

Metcalf, Darcy Ray v. Board of Parole (A61151) (S36782) (99 Or. App. 592)

Reese, Albert K. v. Maass (A61103) (S36716) (99 Or. App. 386)

Ryder/PIE Nationwide, Inc. v. Bennett (A50783) (S36601) (98 Or. App. 592)

Scott, Sidney v. Board of Parole (A60807) (S36762) (99 Or. App. 592)

State v. Davidson, Thomas (A60676) (S36719) (99 Or. App. 385)

State v. Davis, Jamie Russell (A50112) (S36679) (98 Or. App. 752). Fadeley, J., would allow.

State v. Eldridge, Daniel Wayne (A51229) (S36718) (99 Or. App. 386)

State v. Fitzgerald, Ricky Scott (A48174) (S36485) (98 Or. App. 42)

State v. Pirouzkar, Mahin (A47948/49) (S36651) (98 Or. App. 741). Fadeley, J., would allow.Page 334
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩