Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 308 Or. 331 (1989)

308 Or. 331

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1989-09-06
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 308 Or. 331 (1989) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (780 P.2d 222)Oregon Supreme Court. September 6, 1989. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] DENIED Clackamas County v. McManama (A49528) (S36219) (96 Or. App. 547) Meyrovich, Nick v. Board of Parole (A48141) (S36324) (95 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 308 Or. 331 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,308 Or. 331(1989)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(780 P.2d 222)
Oregon Supreme Court.
September 6, 1989.
DENIED
Clackamas County v. McManama (A49528) (S36219) (96 Or. App. 547)

Meyrovich, Nick v. Board of Parole (A48141) (S36324) (95 Or. App. 132)

Robertson v. Jessup (A46568) (S36210) (96 Or. App. 349) (Shultz's petition)

Robertson v. Jessup (A46568) (S36232) (96 Or. App. 349) (Josephine County Title Corp.'s petition)

State v. Hartley, Walter Seaf (A46193) (S36271) (96 Or. App. 722) Peterson, C.J. and Linde, J., would allow.

State v. Holdner, William Frederick (A48914) (S36234) (96 Or. App. 445) (Holdner's petition)

State v. Wattenbarger, David Bruce (A39041) (S36371) (97 Or. App. 414)

Stratis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (A45884) (S36353) (96 Or. App. 706)Page 332
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩