Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 302 Or. 86 (1986)
302 Or. 86
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1986-10-07
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 302 Or. 86 (1986) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (726 P.2d 1185) ALLOWEDOregon Supreme Court. October 7, 1986. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] State v. Adams, Johnathon Emory (A36090) (S33048) (78 Or. App. 428) DENIED October 7, 1986 Charamza and Charamza (A37222) (S33137) (80 Or. App. 461) Downtown Community Association v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 302 Or. 86 (1986). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,302 Or. 86(1986)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(726 P.2d 1185)ALLOWED
Oregon Supreme Court.
October 7, 1986.
State v. Adams, Johnathon Emory (A36090) (S33048) (78 Or. App. 428)
Downtown Community Association v. City of Portland (A40035) (S33180) (80 Or. App. 336)
General Electric Credit Corporation v. United Pacific Insurance Company (A35978) (S33054) (80 Or. App. 129) Lent, J., would allow
Godat v. Waldrop (A35386) (S32901) (78 Or. App. 374)
Luthy v. SAIF Corp. (A36714) (S33151) (80 Or. App. 461)
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. House/Lewis (A34690) (S33071) (80 Or. App. 89) Peterson, C.J., would allow
Smith v. Bull Run School District No. 45 (A35765) (S33116) (80 Or. App. 226)
State v. Donnelly, Edward Robert (A38957) (S33215) (81 Or. App. 107)
State v. Gorley, Douglas Jay (A39743) (S33205) (80 Or. App. 107)
State v. Huskey, Arnold Ray (A33942) (A33948) (S33102) (79 Or. App. 810)
State v. McClintock, John (A39423) (S33203) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. McCormick, Kenneth Don (A29453) (S33169) (80 Or. App. 191)
State v. Mitchell, Jay Douglas (A39186-89) (S33217) (81 Or. App. 107)
State v. O'Brien, Jack Robert (A37107) (S33197) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Paginton, Trevor John (A39144) (S33214) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Radford, Bobby Clarence (A39262) (S33196) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Randolph, Gregory Lee (A38983) (S33194) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Rowe, Charles Shawn (A35240) (S33025) (79 Or. App. 801)
State v. Shelby, Elric Vincent (A38609) (S33198) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Snider, Daniel Duke (A39227/28) (S33218) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Strasser, Ronald Kenneth (A37369/70) (S33109) (80 Or. App. 277)
Wagner and Hicks v. Marion County (A38811) (S32975) (79 Or. App. 233)Page 87
DENIED
October 7, 1986
Charamza and Charamza (A37222) (S33137) (80 Or. App. 461)
Downtown Community Association v. City of Portland (A40035) (S33180) (80 Or. App. 336)
General Electric Credit Corporation v. United Pacific Insurance Company (A35978) (S33054) (80 Or. App. 129) Lent, J., would allow
Godat v. Waldrop (A35386) (S32901) (78 Or. App. 374)
Luthy v. SAIF Corp. (A36714) (S33151) (80 Or. App. 461)
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. House/Lewis (A34690) (S33071) (80 Or. App. 89) Peterson, C.J., would allow
Smith v. Bull Run School District No. 45 (A35765) (S33116) (80 Or. App. 226)
State v. Donnelly, Edward Robert (A38957) (S33215) (81 Or. App. 107)
State v. Gorley, Douglas Jay (A39743) (S33205) (80 Or. App. 107)
State v. Huskey, Arnold Ray (A33942) (A33948) (S33102) (79 Or. App. 810)
State v. McClintock, John (A39423) (S33203) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. McCormick, Kenneth Don (A29453) (S33169) (80 Or. App. 191)
State v. Mitchell, Jay Douglas (A39186-89) (S33217) (81 Or. App. 107)
State v. O'Brien, Jack Robert (A37107) (S33197) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Paginton, Trevor John (A39144) (S33214) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Radford, Bobby Clarence (A39262) (S33196) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Randolph, Gregory Lee (A38983) (S33194) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Rowe, Charles Shawn (A35240) (S33025) (79 Or. App. 801)
State v. Shelby, Elric Vincent (A38609) (S33198) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Snider, Daniel Duke (A39227/28) (S33218) (81 Or. App. 108)
State v. Strasser, Ronald Kenneth (A37369/70) (S33109) (80 Or. App. 277)
Wagner and Hicks v. Marion County (A38811) (S32975) (79 Or. App. 233)Page 87
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩