Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 302 Or. 299 (1986)

PETITIONS FOR Rev., 302 Or. 299 (1986), 302 Or. 299 (Or. 1986)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1986-11-20
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 302 Or. 299 (1986) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED (728 P.2d 531)Oregon Supreme Court. November 20, 1986. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ALLOWED Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation District (A32381) (S33201) (80 Or. App. 602) Heino v. Harper / Heino (A37137) (S33273) (81 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 302 Or. 299 (1986). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,302 Or. 299(1986)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED(728 P.2d 531)
Oregon Supreme Court.
November 20, 1986.
ALLOWED
Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation District (A32381) (S33201) (80 Or. App. 602)

Heino v. Harper / Heino (A37137) (S33273) (81 Or. App. 106)

Oregonian Publishing Company v. O'Leary (A36591) (S33348) (80 Or. App. 754)

State v. Mayfield, John Edgar (A32196) (S33237) (80 Or. App. 305) (Mayfield's petition)

State v. Mayfield, John Edgar (A32196) (S33165) (80 Or. App. 305) (State's petition)
November 25, 1986
1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County Court (A39509) (S33322) (80 Or. App. 532)
DENIED
November 20, 1986
Bilusak v. Capitol Racquet Sports, Inc. (A35207) (S33202) (80 Or. App. 593)

Bitton v. McCollum (A36529) (S33239) (80 Or. App. 461)

Buck v. Motor Vehicles Division (A37283) (S33208) (80 Or. App. 565)

Burback and Burback (A37800) (S33303) (81 Or. App. 74)

Deschamp v. Litchman (A36880) (S33236) (80 Or. App. 791)

Heller v. Employment Division (A37627) (A38610) (S33079) (80 Or. App. 153)

Highburger v. Mendonca (A37234) (S33312) (81 Or. App. 105)

Hillesland v. Paccar, Inc. (A32125) (S33245) (80 Or. App. 286) Lent, Carson, JJ., would allow

LaMarche v. State of Oregon (A36479) (S33341) (81 Or. App. 216)

Land v. Oregon Racing Commission (A38280) (S33350) (80 Or. App. 461)

State v. Anthonissen, Jack Lemar and Donna Kay (A39400) (S33359) (81 Or. App. 445)

State v. Avants, James Riley (A39258/59) (S33356) (81 Or. App. 447)

State v. Baumeister, Brian Keith (A36520) (S33304) (80 Or. App. 626)

State v. Hargrove, Latricia Marie Theresa (A39180) (S33306) (81 Or. App. 107)

State v. Harley, Nelson Wayne (A39478) (S33354) (81 Or. App. 447)

State v. Holt, Steven Frederick (A39225) (S33185) (80 Or. App. 792)

State v. May, Warren Ervin (A39990/91) (S33355) (81 Or. App. 447)

State v. McAlester, Wanda Lee (A37175) (S33065) (80 Or. App. 277)

State v. McCarthy, Kent James (A37509) (S33364) (81 Or. App. 447)

State v. McInnis, Stephen J. (A36135) (S33224) (80 Or. App. 792)

State v. Scott, Gaylen A. (A36814) (S33244) (80 Or. App. 792)

State v. Vasey, James Drews (A38369) (S33243) (80 Or. App. 765)
November 25, 1986
Cameron v. State Department of Transportation (A34844) (S33335) (80 Or. App. 708)

Consolidated Freightways v. Poelwijk (A37467) (A37614) (S33344) (81 Or. App. 311)
(728 P.2d 532)
Delay v. Patel and Rathe (A35546) (S33219) (80 Or. App. 620) (Delay's Petition)

First Interstate Bank v. Bergendahl (A30857) (S33209) (80 Or. App. 479)

Gerke v. Burton Enterprises, Inc. (A32908) (S33268) (80 Or. App. 714)

Marsh, Michael Paul v. Oregon State Penitentiary (A39372) (S33379) (81 Or. App. 447) Linde, Gillette, JJ., would allow

McCumber and McCumber (A38965) (S33326) (81 Or. App. 105)Page 300
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩