Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 297 Or. 492 (1984)

297 Or. 492

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1984-07-24
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 297 Or. 492 (1984) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED ALLOWEDOregon Supreme Court. July 24, 1984. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Company, Inc. (A28635) (S30764) (68 Or. App. 53) Totten v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 297 Or. 492 (1984). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,297 Or. 492(1984)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIEDALLOWED
Oregon Supreme Court.
July 24, 1984.
Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Company, Inc. (A28635) (S30764) (68 Or. App. 53)

Totten v. New York Life Insurance Co. (A28617) (S30836) (68 Or. App. 253)
DENIED
July 24, 1984
Newman v. Martin (A28954) (S30779) (68 Or. App. 384)

Scholze and Scholze (A27923) (S30837) (68 Or. App. 679)

State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Butterfield (A27845) (S30831) (68 Or. App. 355) Campbell, J., would allow

State v. Johnson, Gregory Allen (A30484) (S30830) (68 Or. App. 456)

State v. Robertson, Ollie Belinda (A29934) (S30835) (68 Or. App. 456)

Weathers v. M.C. Lininger Sons, Inc. (A26812) (S30780) (68 Or. App. 30) Carson, J., would allow

White v. Safeco Insurance Company of America (A26499) (S30756) (68 Or. App. 11)

Youngblood, Ray Charles v. Cupp (A29661) (S30814) (68 Or. App. 383)Page 493
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩