Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 294 Or. 78 (1982)

294 Or. 78

Type: Opinion
Court: Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction: Orlaw
Date: 1982-11-16
Topic: general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 294 Or. 78 (1982) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED DENIEDOregon Supreme Court. November 16, 1982. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Casebeer and Casebeer (A23563) (28869) (58 Or. App. 222) Campbell and Carson, JJ. would allow First National Bank v. Swanson (A23838) (28932) (58 Or. App. 749) Oregon Human Rights Coalition v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 294 Or. 78 (1982). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,294 Or. 78(1982)

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIEDDENIED

Oregon Supreme Court.

November 16, 1982.

Casebeer and Casebeer (A23563) (28869) (58 Or. App. 222) Campbell and Carson, JJ. would allow

First National Bank v. Swanson (A23838) (28932) (58 Or. App. 749)

Oregon Human Rights Coalition v. Adult and Family Services Division (A24380) (28946) (on dismissal)

Pacific Building Materials Co. v. Simons (A24248) (28976) (59 Or. App. 133)

State v. Anderson, Mathew John (A23903) (28920) (on dismissal)

State v. Bird, Richard Brian (A20615) (28973) (59 Or. App. 74)

Westside Neighborhood Quality Project v. School District 4J (A23957) (28855) (58 Or. App. 154) Linde and Carson JJ., would allow

Wilson v. Vik Construction Company (A23087) (28925) (58 Or. App. 749)Page 79

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩