Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 294 Or. 492 (1983)
294 Or. 492
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1983-02-08
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 294 Or. 492 (1983) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED DENIEDOregon Supreme Court.February 1, 1983. February 8, 1983. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] City of Portland v. Johnson (A23697) (29134) (59 Or. App. 647) Roberts, J., would allow Palaia, John v. OSP (A25517) (29220) (60 Or.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 294 Or. 492 (1983). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,294 Or. 492(1983)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIEDDENIED
Oregon Supreme Court.
February 1, 1983.
February 8, 1983.
City of Portland v. Johnson (A23697) (29134) (59 Or. App. 647) Roberts, J., would allow
Palaia, John v. OSP (A25517) (29220) (60 Or. App. 785)
RLK Co. v. Public Utility Commission (A25205) (28950) (on dismissal) Peterson, J., would allow
State v. Easter, Roger Loranzy (A25044) (A25047) (29214) (60 Or. App. 785)
State v. Estrada, Raymond (A24669) (29208) (60 Or. App. 331)
State v. Fong, Vincent Wayne (A23799) (29209) (60 Or. App. 331)
State v. Livingston, Marshall Lee (A23301) (29222) (61 Or. App. 225)
State v. Petrie, William Roy (A23430) (29176) (60 Or. App. 351)
Stewart v. City of Eugene (A20533) (28797) (57 Or. App. 627)Page 493
Palaia, John v. OSP (A25517) (29220) (60 Or. App. 785)
RLK Co. v. Public Utility Commission (A25205) (28950) (on dismissal) Peterson, J., would allow
State v. Easter, Roger Loranzy (A25044) (A25047) (29214) (60 Or. App. 785)
State v. Estrada, Raymond (A24669) (29208) (60 Or. App. 331)
State v. Fong, Vincent Wayne (A23799) (29209) (60 Or. App. 331)
State v. Livingston, Marshall Lee (A23301) (29222) (61 Or. App. 225)
State v. Petrie, William Roy (A23430) (29176) (60 Or. App. 351)
Stewart v. City of Eugene (A20533) (28797) (57 Or. App. 627)Page 493
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩