Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 292 Or. 589 (1982)

PETITIONS FOR Rev., 292 Or. 589 (1982), 292 Or. 589 (Or. 1982)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1982-03-02
Topic
general

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 292 Or. 589 (1982) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED ALLOWEDOregon Supreme Court. March 2, 1982. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] McDonnal and McDonnal (18841) (28363) (54 Or. App. 296) State v. Russell, Leland P. (A20189) (28331) (55 Or.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 292 Or. 589 (1982). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,292 Or. 589(1982)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIEDALLOWED
Oregon Supreme Court.
March 2, 1982.
McDonnal and McDonnal (18841) (28363) (54 Or. App. 296)

State v. Russell, Leland P. (A20189) (28331) (55 Or. App. 201)
DENIED
March 2, 1982
Gates v. Horning (19904) (28393) (54 Or. App. 261)

Harp v. Loux (19862) (28391) (54 Or. App. 840)

Johnson v. MacGregor (19405) (28408) (55 Or. App. 374)

McIntyre-Cooper Co. v. Board of Comm. (19925) (28355) (55 Or. App. 78)

Shattuck v. Harlan (A20061) (28371) (55 Or. App. 201)

Shaughnessy v. Spray (19275) (28358) (respondents' Eli Lilly Co.) (55 Or. App. 42) Lent, J. would allow

Shaughnessy v. Spray (19275) (28359) (respondents' Smith, Kline French Lab) (55 Or. App. 42) Lent, J., would allow

State v. Davis, Dickie Lynn (A20140) (28383) (55 Or. App. 433)

State v. Smart, Kenneth Dale (A21150) (28403) (55 Or. App. 433)Page 590
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩