Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 292 Or. 108 (1981)
PETITIONS FOR Rev., 292 Or. 108 (1981), 292 Or. 108 (Or. 1981)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1981-11-17
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 292 Or. 108 (1981) PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED ALLOWEDOregon Supreme Court. November 17, 1981. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Amfac Food v. Int'l Systems (16706) (28071) (52 Or. App. 907) A-1 Sandblasting v. Baiden (17975) (28131) (53 Or.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 292 Or. 108 (1981). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW,292 Or. 108(1981)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIEDALLOWED
Oregon Supreme Court.
November 17, 1981.
Amfac Food v. Int'l Systems (16706) (28071) (52 Or. App. 907)
A-1 Sandblasting v. Baiden (17975) (28131) (53 Or. App. 890)
State v. Underwood, Walter (A20054) (28112) (53 Or. App. 771)
State v. Brock, Dale (17453) (28135) (53 Or. App. 785)
State v. Buttrey, Donna (A20616) (A21002) (28154) (54 Or. App. 40)
State v. Hollowell, A.J. (19792) (28058) (53 Or. App. 520)
Besmehn v. Pacific Coast Shipping (14091) (28065) (53 Or. App. 384)
Bear Creek v. Hopkins (19065) (28068) (53 Or. App. 212)
Oliver v. Pacific Northwest Bell (16540) (28093) (53 Or. App. 604) Lent and Campbell, JJ., would allow
Gump v. Employment Division (A20967) (28095) (53 Or. App. 670)
State v. Caswell, Todd (18200) (28107) (53 Or. App. 693)
Cole v. Speedy (A20320) (28127) (54 Or. App. 38)
State v. Haynes, Arthur (19262) (28137) (appellant Haynes) (53 Or. App. 850)
State v. Haynes, Arthur (19262) (28138) (respondent State of Oregon) (53 Or. App. 850)
CMD Transportation v. Clackamas County (A20480) (28142) (53 Or. App. 961)
Blakeslee v. Davoudi (17783) (28149) (54 Or. App. 9)
State v. Weiland, Glen (A20136) (28150) (54 Or. App. 38)
Swisher v. Roshak (A20528) (28155) (54 Or. App. 38)
Roach v. Hockey (18574) (28110) (53 Or. App. 710) Tongue and Peterson, JJ., would allow
Pearce and Pearce (16621) (28113) (53 Or. App. 521)
Cross v. Brown (A21648) (28115) (no opinion)Page 109
A-1 Sandblasting v. Baiden (17975) (28131) (53 Or. App. 890)
November 24, 1981
Wiggins v. Barrett Associates (16909) (28128) (53 Or. App. 882)
State v. Underwood, Walter (A20054) (28112) (53 Or. App. 771)
December 2, 1981
Wright v. Hazen Investments (17597) (28108) (53 Or. App. 700)
State v. Brock, Dale (17453) (28135) (53 Or. App. 785)
State v. Buttrey, Donna (A20616) (A21002) (28154) (54 Or. App. 40)
DENIED
November 17, 1981
Fergelic, John Joseph v. Cupp (19944) (28053) (53 Or. App. 190) Tongue and Peterson, JJ., would allow
State v. Hollowell, A.J. (19792) (28058) (53 Or. App. 520)
Besmehn v. Pacific Coast Shipping (14091) (28065) (53 Or. App. 384)
Bear Creek v. Hopkins (19065) (28068) (53 Or. App. 212)
Oliver v. Pacific Northwest Bell (16540) (28093) (53 Or. App. 604) Lent and Campbell, JJ., would allow
Gump v. Employment Division (A20967) (28095) (53 Or. App. 670)
State v. Caswell, Todd (18200) (28107) (53 Or. App. 693)
Cole v. Speedy (A20320) (28127) (54 Or. App. 38)
State v. Haynes, Arthur (19262) (28137) (appellant Haynes) (53 Or. App. 850)
State v. Haynes, Arthur (19262) (28138) (respondent State of Oregon) (53 Or. App. 850)
CMD Transportation v. Clackamas County (A20480) (28142) (53 Or. App. 961)
Blakeslee v. Davoudi (17783) (28149) (54 Or. App. 9)
State v. Weiland, Glen (A20136) (28150) (54 Or. App. 38)
Swisher v. Roshak (A20528) (28155) (54 Or. App. 38)
Roach v. Hockey (18574) (28110) (53 Or. App. 710) Tongue and Peterson, JJ., would allow
Pearce and Pearce (16621) (28113) (53 Or. App. 521)
Cross v. Brown (A21648) (28115) (no opinion)Page 109
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩