Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Session

96 Or. App. 363

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Date: 1989-05-03
Topic: general

EDMONDS, J., concurring. I concur with the majority only because a panel of this court has held in a companion case on the same fact, that State v. Ainsworth, 95 Or App 240, 770 P2d 58, rev allowed 308 Or 158 (1989), controls. State v. Gohring, 95 Or App 746, 770 P2d 614 (1989).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Session. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

EDMONDS, J.,

concurring.

I concur with the majority only because a panel of this court has held in a companion case on the same fact, that State v. Ainsworth, 95 Or App 240, 770 P2d 58, rev allowed 308 Or 158 (1989), controls. State v. Gohring, 95 Or App 746, 770 P2d 614 (1989). Were it not for that fact, I would hold that the facts of this case are distinguishable from Ainsworth.