Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

International Paper Co. v. Turner

92 Or. App. 589

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1988-08-17
Topic
general

PER CURIAM International Paper Co. has filed a petition for review and SAIF and Bohemia, Inc., have filed a motion for reconsideration of our opinion. 91 Or App 91, 754 P2d 589 (1988). We deny reconsideration on the petition. We allow reconsideration on the motion for the purpose of modifying our opinion by expressly finding that claimant’s present disability is due to an aggravation of a compensable injury which he suffered while he was employed by International Paper. The additional benefits due under our former opinion are payable by International Paper. Reconsideration on petition for review denied; motion for reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed International Paper Co. v. Turner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM

International Paper Co. has filed a petition for review and SAIF and Bohemia, Inc., have filed a motion for reconsideration of our opinion. 91 Or App 91, 754 P2d 589 (1988). We deny reconsideration on the petition. We allow reconsideration on the motion for the purpose of modifying our opinion by expressly finding that claimant’s present disability is due to an aggravation of a compensable injury which he suffered while he was employed by International Paper. The additional benefits due under our former opinion are payable by International Paper.

Reconsideration on petition for review denied; motion for reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.