Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

Aldrich v. Employment Division

72 Or. App. 176

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Date: 1985-02-06
Topic: general

BUTTLER, P. J., specially concurring. For the reasons stated in my dissent in Cropley v. Employment Division, 72 Or App 93, 694 P2d 1025 (1985), I would reverse the decision of EAB. However, unlike in Cropley, it appears that some of the petitioners here may have joined the strike and would not be entitled to unemployment compensation.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Aldrich v. Employment Division. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 4 opinions

BUTTLER, P. J.,

specially concurring.

For the reasons stated in my dissent in Cropley v. Employment Division, 72 Or App 93, 694 P2d 1025 (1985), I would reverse the decision of EAB. However, unlike in Cropley, it appears that some of the petitioners here may have joined the strike and would not be entitled to unemployment compensation. Barrier v. Employment Division, 29 Or App 387, 563 P2d 1230 (1977). Accordingly, I would remand this case for a determination limited to which petitioners, if any, joined the strike.