Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Kentta

State v. Kentta, 70 Or. App. 606 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Date: 1984-10-31
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM Defendant appeals his convictions of murder and of tampering with a witness. He assigns five errors, only one of which requires our attention. Defendant contends, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred in imposing a mandatory minimum of 15 years on his life sentence for murder. State v. Macy, 295 Or 738, 671 P2d 92 (1983).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Kentta. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions of murder and of tampering with a witness. He assigns five errors, only one of which requires our attention.

Defendant contends, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred in imposing a mandatory minimum of 15 years on his life sentence for murder. State v. Macy, 295 Or 738, 671 P2d 92 (1983).

The portion of the sentence imposing a 15-year minimum on the life sentence for the murder conviction is vacated; otherwise affirmed.