Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Hill
67 Or. App. 7
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1984-02-15
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM Defendant appeals his convictions for assault in the third degree and carrying a concealed weapon. He raises 12 assignments of error, none of which is well taken. We write only to note that, contrary to defendant’s (and, to a certain extent, the trial court’s) guest passenger theory of the law of assault, it was permissible to charge and convict defendant of assault by injuring the passenger in his car through his criminally negligent operation of the car. Affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Hill. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Defendant appeals his convictions for assault in the third degree and carrying a concealed weapon. He raises 12 assignments of error, none of which is well taken. We write only to note that, contrary to defendant’s (and, to a certain extent, the trial court’s) guest passenger theory of the law of assault, it was permissible to charge and convict defendant of assault by injuring the passenger in his car through his criminally negligent operation of the car.
Affirmed.