Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Schroeder
66 Or. App. 754
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1984-02-01
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM In this case of driving under the influence of intoxicants, defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence arising out of a traffic roadblock at which he was stopped and arrested. We cannot perceive a principled way in which this case may be distinguished from State v. Tourtillott, 289 Or 845, 618 P2d 423 (1980). It is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Schroeder. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
In this case of driving under the influence of intoxicants, defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence arising out of a traffic roadblock at which he was stopped and arrested. We cannot perceive a principled way in which this case may be distinguished from State v. Tourtillott, 289 Or 845, 618 P2d 423 (1980). It is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.