Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 64 Or. App. 71 (1983)
PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 64 Or. App. 71 (1983), 64 Or. App. 71 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1983-07-20
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 64 Or. App. 71 (1983) PER CURIAM OPINIONSOregon Court of Appeals. July 20, 1983. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] In the Matter of the Compensation of Humeland, Daniel J., Claimant. Humeland v. SAIF Corporation (A25407).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 64 Or. App. 71 (1983). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PER CURIAM OPINIONS,64 Or. App. 71(1983)
PER CURIAM OPINIONS
Oregon Court of Appeals.
July 20, 1983.
In the Matter of the Compensation of Humeland, Daniel J., Claimant. Humeland v. SAIF Corporation (A25407). Reversed and remanded for a determination of the amount of attorney fees.Kociemba v. SAIF,63 Or. App. 557,665 P.2d 375(1983). (666 P.2d 300)
State v. Purkerson, Merlin Howard (A27789). Reversed and remanded.State v. Garcias,62 Or. App. 472,661 P.2d 123(1983). (666 P.2d 301)
State v. Sandoval, Asencion (A27666); State v. Fox, David Alan (A27924); State v. Graczyk, Leon Vincent (A27979). Reversed and remanded.State v. Garcias,62 Or. App. 472,661 P.2d 123(1983). (666 P.2d 300,aff'd296 Or. 688,679 P.2d 1354(1984))
State v. Purkerson, Merlin Howard (A27789). Reversed and remanded.State v. Garcias,62 Or. App. 472,661 P.2d 123(1983). (666 P.2d 301)
State v. Sandoval, Asencion (A27666); State v. Fox, David Alan (A27924); State v. Graczyk, Leon Vincent (A27979). Reversed and remanded.State v. Garcias,62 Or. App. 472,661 P.2d 123(1983). (666 P.2d 300,aff'd296 Or. 688,679 P.2d 1354(1984))
July 27, 1983
State v. Graczyk, Leon Vincent (A27262)(A27263). Reversed.State v. Garcias,62 Or. App. 472,661 P.2d 123(1983);State v. Anderson,56 Or. App. 12,641 P.2d 40(1982). (667 P.2d 7,aff'd296 Or. 688,679 P.2d 1354(1984))Page 72
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩