Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Wagner

State ex rel. Juvenile Dep’t v. Wagner, 59 Or. App. 121 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1982-09-08
Topic
general

PER CURIAM Based upon our de novo review of this record we conclude that the requisite facts were established by clear and convincing evidence as required by Santosky v. Kramer, 455 US 745, 102 S Ct 1388, 71 L Ed 2d 599 (1982), and that the trial court did not err in terminating respondent’s parental rights to Penny Irene Wagner, ORS 419.523; State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Farrell, 58 Or App 258, 648 P2d 401 (1982). Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Wagner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM

Based upon our de novo review of this record we conclude that the requisite facts were established by clear and convincing evidence as required by Santosky v. Kramer, 455 US 745, 102 S Ct 1388, 71 L Ed 2d 599 (1982), and that the trial court did not err in terminating respondent’s parental rights to Penny Irene Wagner, ORS 419.523; State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Farrell, 58 Or App 258, 648 P2d 401 (1982).

Affirmed.