Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Riegelmann
55 Or. App. 822
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1982-02-02
- Topic
- litigation
PER CURIAM Defendant appeals from a trial court order denying his motion to suppress evidence. He alleges error in the trial court’s denial of a right to present oral argument on the motion. That was not error. See State v. Gholston, 55 Or App 790, 639 P2d 1302 (1981).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Riegelmann. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Defendant appeals from a trial court order denying his motion to suppress evidence. He alleges error in the trial court’s denial of a right to present oral argument on the motion. That was not error. See State v. Gholston, 55 Or App 790, 639 P2d 1302 (1981). A second search was with defendant’s voluntary consent and it was not tainted by any preceding illegality. State v. Quinn, 290 Or 383, 623 P2d 630 (1981).
Affirmed.