Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

Collett v. Cascade Health Care, Inc.

Collett v. Cascade Health Care, Inc., 43 Or. App. 489 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1979-12-03
Topic
estate-planning

PER CURIAM The sole assignment of error concerns the giving of n instruction which the plaintiff contends was er-oneous. Assuming for the sake of argument that the istruction was not a correct statement of law, and hat error was preserved by a proper objection and ansidering the challenged instruction in the context f the instructions as a whole, we nevertheless affirm. Or Const, Amended Art VII, § 3; ORS 19.125(2). Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Collett v. Cascade Health Care, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
PER CURIAM

The sole assignment of error concerns the giving of n instruction which the plaintiff contends was er-oneous. Assuming for the sake of argument that the istruction was not a correct statement of law, and hat error was preserved by a proper objection and ansidering the challenged instruction in the context f the instructions as a whole, we nevertheless affirm. Or Const, Amended Art VII, § 3; ORS 19.125(2).

Affirmed.