Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
Collett v. Cascade Health Care, Inc.
43 Or. App. 489
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1979-12-03
- Topic
- estate-planning
PER CURIAM The sole assignment of error concerns the giving of n instruction which the plaintiff contends was er-oneous. Assuming for the sake of argument that the istruction was not a correct statement of law, and hat error was preserved by a proper objection and ansidering the challenged instruction in the context f the instructions as a whole, we nevertheless affirm. Or Const, Amended Art VII, § 3; ORS 19.125(2). Affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Collett v. Cascade Health Care, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
The sole assignment of error concerns the giving of n instruction which the plaintiff contends was er-oneous. Assuming for the sake of argument that the istruction was not a correct statement of law, and hat error was preserved by a proper objection and ansidering the challenged instruction in the context f the instructions as a whole, we nevertheless affirm. Or Const, Amended Art VII, § 3; ORS 19.125(2).
Affirmed.