Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Setera

State v. Setera, 42 Or. App. 377 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1979-10-01
Topic
general

PER CURIAM In case number 14199, the state concedes that the judgment order was in error insofar as it designated the conviction on Count II (which charged a misdemeanor) as a felony, and the conviction on Count III (which charged a felony) as a misdemeanor. Case number 14199 is remanded for entry of a correct judgment order and is affirmed in all other respects. Number 14198 is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Setera. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM

In case number 14199, the state concedes that the judgment order was in error insofar as it designated the conviction on Count II (which charged a misdemeanor) as a felony, and the conviction on Count III (which charged a felony) as a misdemeanor. Case number 14199 is remanded for entry of a correct judgment order and is affirmed in all other respects.

Number 14198 is affirmed.