Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Robinson
State v. Robinson, 25 Or. App. 675 (Or. Ct. App. 1976)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1976-06-14
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that ineffective assistance claims typically must be raised in a PCR proceeding
- acknowledging that Oregon requires claims for ineffective assistance to be raised in a collateral proceeding
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Robinson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 23 opinions
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, having been convicted of murder upon trial by jury, contends on appeal that his trial counsel was incompetent. This issue, except in rare instances, is one which can be properly resolved only in a post-conviction proceeding in which evidence can be taken. See, Turner v. Cupp, 1 Or App 596, 465 P2d 249 (1970). This is not one of those rare instances.
Affirmed.