Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
Dewitt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
124 Or. App. 432
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1993-11-03
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that deferred his parole release date for 18 months after he violated his parole. ORS 144.335. He argues that the Board’s reliance on documents not disclosed to him during a prison term hearing violates his rights under Article I, sections 10 and 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We have decided the issues presented by petitioner contrary to his position. Flowers v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dewitt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that deferred his parole release date for 18 months after he violated his parole. ORS 144.335. He argues that the Board’s reliance on documents not disclosed to him during a prison term hearing violates his rights under Article I, sections 10 and 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
We have decided the issues presented by petitioner contrary to his position. Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331, 862 P2d 1312 (1993).
Petitioner’s other arguments do not require discussion.
Affirmed.