Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Kelly

121 Or. App. 99

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1993-06-09
Topic
international-arbitration

PER CURIAM Defendant was charged in a 35-count indictment. He pled guilty to eight counts, and the other charges were dismissed pursuant to plea negotiations. He challenges the sentences imposed on the convictions. The sentences resulted from the plea agreement, and, under ORS 138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error. State v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Kelly. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged in a 35-count indictment. He pled guilty to eight counts, and the other charges were dismissed pursuant to plea negotiations. He challenges the sentences imposed on the convictions. The sentences resulted from the plea agreement, and, under ORS 138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error. State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.