Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

SAIF Corp. v. Humphrey

SAIF Corp. v. Humphrey, 121 Or. App. 669 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Date: 1993-07-14
Topic: general

PER CURIAM In this workers’ compensation case, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant’s compen-sable injury is the major contributing cause of his need for surgery. The claim is therefore compensable under ORS 656. 005(7)(a)(B). U-Haul of Oregon v. Burtis, 120 Or App 353, 852 P2d 897 (1993). Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SAIF Corp. v. Humphrey. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM

In this workers’ compensation case, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant’s compen-sable injury is the major contributing cause of his need for surgery. The claim is therefore compensable under ORS 656. 005(7)(a)(B). U-Haul of Oregon v. Burtis, 120 Or App 353, 852 P2d 897 (1993).

Affirmed.