Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
Siegelbaum v. Johnson
119 Or. App. 164
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1993-03-31
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM Defendants concede that the trial court erred in awarding them $929.32 as supplemental costs and disbursements. Accordingly, the award of costs and disbursements to them should be reduced by that amount. Otherwise, we affirm without discussion on the appeal and on the cross-appeal. On appeal, reversed and remanded with instructions to reduce award of costs and disbursements to defendants by $929.32; otherwise affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Siegelbaum v. Johnson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Defendants concede that the trial court erred in awarding them $929.32 as supplemental costs and disbursements. Accordingly, the award of costs and disbursements to them should be reduced by that amount. Otherwise, we affirm without discussion on the appeal and on the cross-appeal.
On appeal, reversed and remanded with instructions to reduce award of costs and disbursements to defendants by $929.32; otherwise affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal.