Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

Watson v. Klamath County

112 Or. App. 268

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1992-04-01
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM In this personal injury negligence action, the trial court denied plaintiffs motion for a directed verdict. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Klamath County. The trial court then granted plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict against the county. County appeals. There was evidence from which the jury could have determined that negligence of the driver of the vehicle in which plaintiff was riding was the sole cause of the accident and plaintiffs injuries.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Watson v. Klamath County. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM

In this personal injury negligence action, the trial court denied plaintiffs motion for a directed verdict. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Klamath County. The trial court then granted plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict against the county. County appeals.

There was evidence from which the jury could have determined that negligence of the driver of the vehicle in which plaintiff was riding was the sole cause of the accident and plaintiffs injuries. The issue was properly submitted to the jury. The trial court erred in granting the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

We affirm on plaintiffs cross-appeal.

On appeal, reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment on the jury verdict; affirmed on cross-appeal.