Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Conquest
111 Or. App. 121
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1992-01-22
- Topic
- general
reversed in part and remanded with instructions; otherwise affirmed January 22, reconsideration denied April 15, petition for review allowed August 25, 1992 (314 Or 175) Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Conquest. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
reversed in part and remanded with instructions; otherwise affirmed January 22,
reconsideration denied April 15,
petition for review allowed August 25, 1992 (314 Or 175)
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.