Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
Perez v. State Board of Parole
102 Or. App. 117
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1990-06-06
- Topic
- general
*118 PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole. By a previous order, the Board had established a parole release date for petitioner. He did not seek judicial review of that order but requested “administrative review of the decision by the Board.” Its resulting order, from which he seeks judicial review, did not modify the original decision or in any way set a prison term; it only denied reconsideration. It is not a final order subject to review under ORS 144.335. We do not have jurisdiction.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Perez v. State Board of Parole. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole. By a previous order, the Board had established a parole release date for petitioner. He did not seek judicial review of that order but requested “administrative review of the decision by the Board.” Its resulting order, from which he seeks judicial review, did not modify the original decision or in any way set a prison term; it only denied reconsideration. It is not a final order subject to review under ORS 144.335. We do not have jurisdiction.
Petition for judicial review dismissed.