Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
Miller v. Hubbard-Wray Co.
Miller v. Hubbard-Wray Co., 53 Or. App. 531 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1981-08-24
- Topic
- general
THORNTON, J. Defendant Hubbard-Wray, Co., in its Petition for Review, points out that our fact statement is in error in stating that the hay baler sold by defendant to plaintiff was later returned to defendant and that defendant had accepted return of the baler and sold it. The opinion is modified accordingly. Reconsideration granted; former opinion adhered to as modified.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Miller v. Hubbard-Wray Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Defendant Hubbard-Wray, Co., in its Petition for Review, points out that our fact statement is in error in stating that the hay baler sold by defendant to plaintiff was later returned to defendant and that defendant had accepted return of the baler and sold it. The opinion is modified accordingly.
Reconsideration granted; former opinion adhered to as modified.