Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Lanham
74 Ohio St. 3d 1453
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 1995-11-13
- Topic
- bankruptcy
Medina County, No. 2295-M. Appellant has filed an untimely appeal of the court of appeals’ decision denying his application for delayed reopening under App.R. 26(B) and a motion for delayed appeal. This appeal involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(4) apply. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective November 8,1995, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, stricken.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Lanham. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
Medina County, No. 2295-M. Appellant has filed an untimely appeal of the court of appeals’ decision denying his application for delayed reopening under App.R. 26(B) and a motion for delayed appeal. This appeal involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(4) apply. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective November 8,1995, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, stricken.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that, in that appellant failed to perfect an appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1), this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.