Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland
67 Ohio St. 3d 436
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 1993-10-06
- Topic
- litigation
Per Curiam. The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding particular witness statements not exempt as trial preparation records. See State ex rel. Williams v. Cleveland (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 544, 597 N.E.2d 147; State ex rel.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding particular witness statements not exempt as trial preparation records. See State ex rel. Williams v. Cleveland (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 544, 597 N.E.2d 147; State ex rel. Coleman v. Cincinnati (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 83, 566 N.E.2d 151.
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., not participating.