Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

MERIT DOCKET, 67 Ohio St.3d 1509 (1993)

MERIT DOCKET, 67 Ohio St.3d 1509 (1993), 67 Ohio St. 3d 1509 (Ohio 1993)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 1993-01-01
Topic: general

MERIT DOCKET, 67 Ohio St.3d 1509 (1993) 622 N.E.2d 648-660Supreme Court of Ohio. 1993. MERIT DOCKET Wednesday, November 24, 1993 92-2645. State ex rel. Knafel v. Court of Appeals, Ninth Judicial Dist. of Ohio.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MERIT DOCKET, 67 Ohio St.3d 1509 (1993). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MERIT DOCKET,67 Ohio St.3d 1509(1993)

622 N.E.2d 648-660

Supreme Court of Ohio.

1993.

MERIT DOCKET

Wednesday, November 24, 1993

92-2645.State ex rel. Knafel v. Court of Appeals, Ninth Judicial Dist. of Ohio. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur.

WRIGHT and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.93-957.State v. Bedford.Hamilton County, No. C-840850. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

A.W. SWEENEY and WRIGHT, JJ., would grant delayed reconsideration.93-1344.State v. McIntyre.Summit County, No. 15348. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

A.W. SWEENEY and WRIGHT, JJ., would grant delayed reconsideration.93-1417.State v. Carter.Paulding County, No. 11-87-9. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

A.W. SWEENEY and WRIGHT, JJ., would grant delayed reconsideration.93-1440.State v. Scott.Lucas County, No. L-88-323. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

A.W. SWEENEY and WRIGHT, JJ., would grant delayed reconsideration.93-1443.State v. Holley.Hamilton County, No. C-850195. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

A.W. SWEENEY and WRIGHT, JJ., would grant delayed reconsideration.93-1531.State ex rel. Fein v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. In Mandamus. On motion for summary judgment.Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

F.E. SWEENEY, J., would grant the motion for summary judgment.93-1571.State v. Brown.Lorain County, No. 89CA004643. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

A.W. SWEENEY and WRIGHT, JJ., would grant delayed reconsideration.93-1615.State v. Taylor.Butler County, No. CA86-07-117. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

A.W. SWEENEY and WRIGHT, JJ., would grant delayed reconsideration.93-1782.Solomon v. Morris. In Habeas Corpus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-1805.Williams v. Williams.Cuyahoga County, No. 62267. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-1835.People Free Sovereign of Ohio, Republic, ex rel. Faulkner v. Tate. In Habeas Corpus.Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-1846.State ex rel. Aleman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

WRIGHT, J., would grant the motion to dismiss as to habeas corpus, but would deny as to mandamus.

F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.93-1885.Harris v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. In Habeas Corpus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.Page 151093-1906.Watters v. Littlefield. In Habeas Corpus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-1907.Ingram v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents.93-1909.Vasquez v. Baker. In Habeas Corpus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.