Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

MERIT DOCKET, 67 Ohio St.3d 1500 (1993)

MERIT DOCKET, 67 Ohio St.3d 1500 (1993), 67 Ohio St. 3d 1500 (Ohio 1993)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 1993-01-01
Topic: general

MERIT DOCKET, 67 Ohio St.3d 1500 (1993) 622 N.E.2d 648-660Supreme Court of Ohio. 1993. MERIT DOCKET Wednesday, November 17, 1993 92-2139. State v. Buell. Cuyahoga County, No. 31875.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MERIT DOCKET, 67 Ohio St.3d 1500 (1993). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MERIT DOCKET,67 Ohio St.3d 1500(1993)

622 N.E.2d 648-660

Supreme Court of Ohio.

1993.

MERIT DOCKET

Wednesday, November 17, 1993

92-2139.State v. Buell.Cuyahoga County, No. 31875. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.92-2373.State v. Sowell.Hamilton County, No. C-830835. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.92-2395.State v. Steffen.Hamilton County, No. C-830445. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-160.State v. Shelton.Delaware County, No. 91CA7. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-183.State v. Beuke.Hamilton County, No. C-830829. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-324.State v. Myers.Lorain County, No. 89CA004715. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-344.State v. Marcum.Clermont County, No. CA89-10-089. Judgment affirmed and motion for delayed reconsideration denied.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-534.State v. Greer.Hamilton County, No. C-870333. Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-1199.Reynoldsburg Trucking Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. Public Utilities Commission, No. 89-247-TR-ACE. On motions to dismiss and to establish briefing schedule. Motion to dismiss sustained; motion to establish briefing schedule denied. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur.

A.W. SWEENEY, RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.93-1385.State ex rel. Ballard v. Holland. In Habeas Corpus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-1428.Walton v. Wyandot Cty. Sheriff. In Habeas Corpus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-1457.Walls v. Lewis Ctr. In Habeas Corpus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-1721.Johnson v. Wilkinson. In Mandamus.Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent and would grant an alternative writ for want of a proper answer.93-1750.State ex rel. Thrower v. Sweeney. In Prohibition.Suasponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.Page 150193-1752.Lang v. Jackson. In Habeas Corpus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-1791.Sheely v. Eleventh Dist. Court of Appeals for Portage Cty. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

F.E. SWEENEY, J., would deny the writ as moot.93-1803.Quirke v. Mackey. In Mandamus.Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-1842.Schilling v. Mancini. In Mandamus.Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.93-1854.State ex rel. Morrow v. Moon. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.