Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET, 63 Ohio St.3d 1460 (1992)

Admin. DOCKET, 63 Ohio St.3d 1460 (1992), 63 Ohio St. 3d 1460 (Ohio 1992)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 1992-01-01
Topic: general

ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET, 63 Ohio St.3d 1460 (1992) 590 N.E.2d 749-757Supreme Court of Ohio. 1992. ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET Wednesday, May 6, 1992 1. Proposed amendments to Gov.Bar R. III and DR 2-102 (lawyer practice in multiple firms) will be published for a thirty-day public-comment period. 2. Proposed amendments to Civ.R. 41, previously submitted to the General Assembly, are withdrawn. 3.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET, 63 Ohio St.3d 1460 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET,63 Ohio St.3d 1460(1992)

590 N.E.2d 749-757

Supreme Court of Ohio.

1992.

ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET

Wednesday, May 6, 1992

1. Proposed amendments to Gov.Bar R. III and DR 2-102 (lawyer practice in multiple firms) will be published for a thirty-day public-comment period.

2. Proposed amendments to Civ.R. 41, previously submitted to the General Assembly, are withdrawn.

3. Proposed amendments to App.R. 24 will be resubmitted to the General Assembly as modified.

DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent and would withdraw from the General Assembly the proposed amendments to App.R. 24, Civ.R. 26, and Civ.R. 41 consistent with their previous votes.