Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED, 43 Ohio St.3d 702 (1989)

JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED, 43 Ohio St.3d 702 (1989), 43 Ohio St. 3d 702 (Ohio 1989)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 1989-01-01
Topic: general

JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED, 43 Ohio St.3d 702 (1989) 539 N.E.2d 163-167Supreme Court of Ohio. 1989. JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED Wednesday, May 17, 1989 89-298. Sutton v. Spencer. Cuyahoga County, Nos. 54896 and 54924.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED, 43 Ohio St.3d 702 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED,43 Ohio St.3d 702(1989)

539 N.E.2d 163-167

Supreme Court of Ohio.

1989.

JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED

Wednesday, May 17, 1989

89-298.Sutton v. Spencer.Cuyahoga County, Nos. 54896 and 54924.

Resnick, J., dissents.89-333.State v. Adams.Mahoning County, No. 86 C.A. 174.89-379.State v. Hudson.Licking County, No. CA-3392.89-432.Becker v. Lake Cty. Memorial Hospital West.LakeCounty, No. 12-105. On motion and cross-motion to certify the record. Motions overruled.89-481.Griffith v. Mansfield.Richland County, No. CA-2589.

Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.89-486.State v. Ferris.Warren County, No. CA88-05-042.89-489.Cook v. Maxwell.Hamilton County, No. C-880078.

Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., dissent.Page 70389-505.Fraternal Order of Police v. Akron.Summit County, No. 13573.

Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.89-510.State v. Haller.Franklin County, No. 87AP-413.

H. Brown, J., dissents.89-512.Winkelman v. Cincinnati.Hamilton County, No. C-880145.

Douglas and Wright, JJ., dissent.89-517.McElhaney v. Monroe.Summit County, No. 13454.

Moyer, C.J., dissents.89-518.Morgan v. Ohio Council 8.Summit County, No. 13812.89-526.Thomas v. Erie Cty. Dept. of Personnel Serv.ErieCounty, No. E-88-23.

Resnick, J., not participating.89-557.In re Farmer.Summit County, No. 13776.