Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio
MOTION DOCKET, 74 Ohio St.3d 1510 (1996)
74 Ohio St.3d 1510
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohlaw Ohio
- Jurisdiction
- Ohlaw
- Date
- 1996-01-01
- Topic
- general
MOTION DOCKET, 74 Ohio St.3d 1510 (1996) 659 N.E.2d 1284-1290Supreme Court of Ohio. 1996. MOTION DOCKET Wednesday, January 31, 1996 95-170. In re Adoption of Zschach. Fairfield County, Nos. 1994CA14 and 1994CA19. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Fairfield County.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MOTION DOCKET, 74 Ohio St.3d 1510 (1996). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
MOTION DOCKET,74 Ohio St.3d 1510(1996)
659 N.E.2d 1284-1290
Supreme Court of Ohio.
1996.
Wednesday, January 31, 1996
95-170.In re Adoption of Zschach.Fairfield County, Nos. 1994CA14 and 1994CA19. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Fairfield County. Upon consideration of appellant's emergency motion for stay pending appeal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay pending appeal be, and hereby is, granted, effective January 30, 1996.
COOK, J., dissents.95-1222.Byrnes v. LCI Communication Holdings Co.FranklinCounty, Nos. 94APE09-1372 and 94APE09-1396. On motion for admissionpro hac viceof Cathy Ventrell-Monsees by Russell Kelm. Motion granted.95-1430.State v. Haught.Summit County, No. 16848. This cause was held for the decision in 94-2526,State v. Pless(1996),74 Ohio St.3d 333,658 N.E.2d 766, and the briefing schedule was stayed.Sua sponte, the parties are to brief the issue whether "filed" means "time-stamped"; no oral argument is to be scheduled.
RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.95-1906.State v. Knisely.Huron County, No. H-94-044. On motion for admissionpro hac vice.Motion granted.95-2139.Dayton Bar Assn. v. Overman. Upon consideration of respondent's motion to reschedule oral argument currently scheduled for February 6, 1996,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to reschedule oral argument be, and hereby is, denied, effective January 30, 1996.95-2441.State v. Loesser.Cuyahoga County, No. 66762. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals' Journal Entry filed December 5, 1995: "The motion of the appellant to certify a conflict between this Court's decision and the judgment inState v. Trivedi(1982),8 Ohio App.3d 412[8 OBR 534,457 N.E.2d 868], is hereby granted.
"The rule of law upon which this alleged conflict exists is whether the trial court, pursuant to R.C.2951.02(B)(9) and R.C.2951.02(C), has the authority to order restitution as a condition of probation asPage 1511compensation to the victim for injury, damage or loss sustained other than property damage or the value of the property which is subject of any theft offense."Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 95-2439,infra.95-2448.In re Turner.Stark County, No. 1994CA00366. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists;sua sponte, cause consolidated with 95-2446,infra;briefing schedule stayed.95-2501.State v. Johnston.Franklin County, No. 95APC06-695. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists;sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466,State v. Gustafson, Mahoning County, No. 94 C.A. 232; briefing schedule stayed; cause consolidated with 95-2430,infra.95-2506.State v. Francis.Warren County, Nos. CA95-04-039, CA95-04-040 and CA95-05-050. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists;suasponte, cause held for the decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466,supra;briefing schedule stayed.
PFEIFER, J., dissents.95-2589.State v. Mosley.Franklin County, No. 94APA12-1707. On motion for appointment of counsel. Motion denied.95-2653.State v. Braxton.Lucas County, No. L-94-355. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.
RESNICK, J., not participating.95-2670.State v. Darrington.Cuyahoga County, No. 65588. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
DOUGLAS, RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.96-30.State v. Eves.Warren County, No. CA95-02-010. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists;sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466,supra;briefing schedule stayed.96-164.Watson v. Miami Cty. Mun. Court.Miami County, No. 95CA71. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Miami County. Upon consideration of appellant's motion for stay,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied, effective January 30, 1996.