Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 70 Ohio St.3d 1457 (1994)

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 70 Ohio St.3d 1457 (1994), 70 Ohio St. 3d 1457 (Ohio 1994)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 1994-01-01
Topic: general

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 70 Ohio St.3d 1457 (1994) 639 N.E.2d 792-796Supreme Court of Ohio. 1994. RECONSIDERATION DOCKET Wednesday, September 28, 1994 93-904. State ex rel. Levin v. Sheffield Lake.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 70 Ohio St.3d 1457 (1994). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET,70 Ohio St.3d 1457(1994)

639 N.E.2d 792-796

Supreme Court of Ohio.

1994.

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

Wednesday, September 28, 1994

93-904.State ex rel. Levin v. Sheffield Lake.Lorain County, No. 91CA005225. Reported at70 Ohio St.3d 104,637 N.E.2d 319. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.94-11 and 94-153.Howard v. Catholic Social Serv. of Cuyahoga Cty., Inc.Cuyahoga County, No. 66594. Reported at70 Ohio St.3d 141,637 N.E.2d 890. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.Page 145894-797.In re Estate of Mayer.Lucas County, No. L-93-131. Reported at70 Ohio St.3d 1415,637 N.E.2d 11. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and discretionary appeal allowed;sua sponte, briefing schedule stayed; cause held for decision inWright v. Bloom(1994),69 Ohio St.3d 596,635 N.E.2d 31.

WRIGHT, J., would grant the motion for rehearing, but would remand the cause to the court of appeals for it to reconsider its decision in light ofWright v. Bloom(1994),69 Ohio St.3d 596,635 N.E.2d 31.

RESNICK, J., not participating.94-1113.Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Guman Brothers Farm.Ashtabula County, No. 93-A-1787. Reported at70 Ohio St.3d 1428,638 N.E.2d 89. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and discretionary appeal allowed.

WRIGHT, RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.