Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

MOTION DOCKET, 62 Ohio St.3d 1494 (1992)

MOTION DOCKET, 62 Ohio St.3d 1494 (1992), 62 Ohio St. 3d 1494 (Ohio 1992)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 1992-01-01
Topic: general

MOTION DOCKET, 62 Ohio St.3d 1494 (1992) 583 N.E.2d 965-974Supreme Court of Ohio. 1992. MOTION DOCKET Wednesday, January 15, 1992 90-2347. State, ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co., v. Yance.Franklin County, No. 88AP-1179.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MOTION DOCKET, 62 Ohio St.3d 1494 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MOTION DOCKET,62 Ohio St.3d 1494(1992)

583 N.E.2d 965-974

Supreme Court of Ohio.

1992.

MOTION DOCKET

Wednesday, January 15, 1992

90-2347.State, ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co., v. Yance.Franklin County, No. 88AP-1179. On request for oral argument. Request denied.91-930.State, ex rel. Frenz, v. Gwin.Stark County, No. CA-8515. On request for oral argument. Request denied.

MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT and H. BROWN, JJ., dissent.91-1609.Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 90-107-EL-EFC and 90-108-EL-EFC. On motion to consolidate with 91-2339,Consumers' Counsel v. Pub.Util. Comm., Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 91-07-EL-EFC and 91-08-EL-EFC. Motion granted.

DOUGLAS, J., not participating.91-1044.Myers v. Pub. Util. Comm. Public Utilities Commission, No. 90-1315-EL-CSS. On motion to compel intervention. Motion denied.91-1814.State v. LaPoint.Lucas County, No. L-89-362. On motion for leave to file memorandum in support instanter. Motion granted.

RESNICK, J., not participating.91-1815.State v. LaPoint.Lucas County, No. L-89-362. On motion for leave to file memorandum in support instanter. Motion granted.

RESNICK, J., not participating.Page 149591-1825.Cassell v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. In Habeas Corpus. On motion for bond. Motion denied.91-1899.Centex Telemanagement, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm. Public Utilities Commission, No. 91-1219-TP-AEC. On motion for leave to intervene of Ohio Bell Telephone Co. Motion granted.91-2010.Turner v. Turner.Lorain County, No. 91CA004961. On motion to certify the record.Sua sponte, cause held for decision in 90-2187,Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc., Greene County, No. 89-CA-84; briefing schedule stayed.

SWEENEY, WRIGHT and H. BROWN, JJ., dissent.91-2074.State v. Williams.Lucas County, No. L-90-175. On motion for stay pending consideration of 90-1898,State v.Pierce, Delaware County, No. 89-CA-30. Motion granted.91-2263.Pandey v. Cleveland Pub. Library.Cuyahoga County, No. 58632. On motion for leave to file memorandum in support instanter. Motion granted.91-2303.State v. Collins.Cuyahoga County, No. 58291. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

WRIGHT and H. BROWN, JJ., dissent.91-2331.State v. Frazier.Medina County, No. 1983. On motion for leave to exceed page limit. Motion denied.

SWEENEY, DOUGLAS and H. BROWN, JJ., dissent.91-2366.State v. Klein.Cuyahoga County, No. 58389. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

MOYER, C.J., dissents.91-2371.State v. Williams.Lucas County, No. L-82-011. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

DOUGLAS, J., dissents.92-83.State, ex rel. Columbus Southern Power Co., v. Sheward. In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of the motion of the city of Columbus, Ronald J. O'Brien, William Spratley, and Marvin Rothhaar to intervene as respondents,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion to intervene be, and the same is hereby, granted.

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator's motion for issuance of alternative writ of prohibition,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for issuance of alternative writ of prohibition be, and the same is hereby, granted to the extent that the parties are ordered to comply with the following briefing schedule:

On or before Tuesday, January 21, 1992, respondent and intervenors shall file any answer, motion, or other defense to relator's complaint. On or before Tuesday, January 21, 1992, all parties shall file any evidence they intend to present and briefs on all issues raised by any pleadings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court,sua sponte, that the status quo of the proceedings and temporary restraining order issued on January 10, 1992, inRonald J. O'Brien et al. v. ColumbusSouthern Power Company, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas case No. 92CVH01-208, shall be preserved and the temporary restraining order shall not be dissolved until further order of this court.