Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Mays
114 Ohio St. 3d 1506
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 2007-08-29
- Topic
- general
Licking App. No. 2006-CA-00097, 2007-Ohio-2807. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed July 3, 2007: “May a police officer who witnesses a motorist cross a right white edge line and without any further evidence of erratic driving or that the crossing was done in an unsafe manner make a constitutional stop of the motorist?” Cupp, J., not participating.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Mays. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Licking App. No. 2006-CA-00097, 2007-Ohio-2807. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed July 3, 2007:
“May a police officer who witnesses a motorist cross a right white edge line and without any further evidence of erratic driving or that the crossing was done in an unsafe manner make a constitutional stop of the motorist?”
Cupp, J., not participating.The conflict case is State v. Phillips, Logan App. No. 8-04-25, 2006-Ohio-6338.