Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 71 Ohio St.3d 1407 (1994)

71 Ohio St.3d 1407

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction
Ohlaw
Date
1994-01-01
Topic
general

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 71 Ohio St.3d 1407 (1994) 641 N.E.2d 201-205Supreme Court of Ohio. 1994. RECONSIDERATION DOCKET Wednesday, November 9, 1994 85-712. State v. Buell. Cuyahoga County, No. 48621.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 71 Ohio St.3d 1407 (1994). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET,71 Ohio St.3d 1407(1994)
641 N.E.2d 201-205
Supreme Court of Ohio.
1994.
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET
Wednesday, November 9, 1994
85-712.State v. Buell.Cuyahoga County, No. 48621. Reported at70 Ohio St.3d 1211,639 N.E.2d 110. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

A.W. SWEENEY and WRIGHT, JJ., dissent.92-2273.Dandino v. Hoover.Lucas County, No. L-91-078. Reported at70 Ohio St.3d 506,639 N.E.2d 767. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

WRIGHT, J., dissents.

RESNICK, J., not participating.93-808.Horner v. Toledo Hosp.Lucas County, No. L-91-417. Reported at70 Ohio St.3d 1211,639 N.E.2d 109. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.93-1811.State ex rel. Martines v. Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Cuyahoga County, No. 64837. Reported at70 Ohio St.3d 416,639 N.E.2d 80. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.

On request for oral argument. Request denied.

RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.93-2038.Stewart v. Kennedy.Hamilton County, No. C-920152. Reported at70 Ohio St.3d 536,639 N.E.2d 790. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

MOYER, C.J., and WRIGHT, J., dissent.94-1311.Nozik v. Mentor Lagoons, Inc.Lake County, No. 93-L-057. Reported at70 Ohio St.3d 1454,639 N.E.2d 793. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

PFEIFER, J., dissents.94-1351.Grigsby v. Anesthesiologists of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.Hamilton County, No. C-930008. Reported at70 Ohio St.3d 1455,639 N.E.2d 793. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.Page 1408