Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Pinero v. RITE AID OF NEW YORK, INC

Pinero v. RITE AID OF N.Y., INC, 99 N.Y.2d 541 (New York Court of Appeals 2002)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 2002-12-12
Topic: litigation

99 N.Y.2d 541 (2002) 783 N.E.2d 895 753 N.Y.S.2d 805 CAJ H. PINERO, Appellant, v. RITE AID OF NEW YORK, INC., Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided December 12, 2002. *542 Robert J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pinero v. RITE AID OF NEW YORK, INC. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

99 N.Y.2d 541 (2002) 783 N.E.2d 895 753 N.Y.S.2d 805

CAJ H. PINERO, Appellant,
v.
RITE AID OF NEW YORK, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 12, 2002.

*542 Robert J. Tolchin, New York City, for appellant.

Friedberg & Raven, LLP, New York City (Scott Gurtman of counsel), for respondent.

Michaels & Smolak, P.C., Auburn (Michael G. Bersani of counsel), for New York State Trial Lawyers Association, amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY, ROSENBLATT and GRAFFEO.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division properly determined that plaintiff's accident was not within the reasonably foreseeable risks of the defendant's alleged negligence (see, Di Ponzio v Riordan, 89 NY2d 578, 583-584).