Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Rosner v. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance

96 N.Y.2d 727

Type: Opinion
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 2001-01-11
Topic: general

Certification of question by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.17 of the *728Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.17), accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument. Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rosner v. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Certification of question by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.17 of the *728 Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.17), accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo.