Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

People v. Di Napoli

66 N.Y.2d 812

Type: Opinion
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1985-11-14
Topic: general

OPINION OF THE COURT Order reversed, defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment denied, and indictment reinstated. Having reviewed the *815transcript of the testimony before the Grand Jury, we agree with the dissenter at the Appellate Division that the circumstantial evidence presented was such that "if unexplained and uncontradicted would warrant conviction by a trial jury” and thus was legally sufficient (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105; People v Mayo, 36 NY2d 1002; CPL 70.10 [1]). Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Di Napoli. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 7 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment denied, and indictment reinstated. Having reviewed the *815 transcript of the testimony before the Grand Jury, we agree with the dissenter at the Appellate Division that the circumstantial evidence presented was such that "if unexplained and uncontradicted would warrant conviction by a trial jury” and thus was legally sufficient (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105; People v Mayo, 36 NY2d 1002; CPL 70.10 [1]).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.