Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Westchester County Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Del Bello
47 N.Y.2d 886
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1979-06-14
- Topic
- employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation
OPINION OF THE COURT Order reversed, without costs; in the proceeding the petition is dismissed and in the actions judgment is granted in favor of defendants declaring that Local Law No. 11 is valid and constitutional and may go into effect on July 1, 1979, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Frank D. O’Connor at the Appellate Division. Oral application for leave to file a sur reply brief denied. *888Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Fuchs-berg.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Westchester County Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Del Bello. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Westchester County Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., et al., Respondents,
v.
Alfred B. Del Bello et al., Appellants.
In the Matter of Thomas Spasiano et al., Respondents,
v.
Albert T. Hayduk et al., Appellants.
Thomas Spasiano et al., Respondents,
v.
Alfred B. Del Bello et al., Appellants.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued June 6, 1979. Decided June 14, 1979.Samuel S. Yasgur, County Attorney (Jonathan Lovett, Kenneth E. Powell and Lester D. Steinman of counsel), for appellants.
James M. Rose, Arthur H. Grae and Natasha H. Rose for Westchester County Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., and another, respondents.
B. Anthony Morosco for Thomas Spasiano and others, respondents.
Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and MEYER. Taking no part: Judge FUCHSBERG.
Order reversed, without costs; in the proceeding the petition is dismissed and in the actions judgment is granted in favor of defendants declaring that Local Law No. 11 is valid and constitutional and may go into effect on July 1, 1979, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice FRANK D. O'CONNOR at the Appellate Division. Oral application for leave to file a sur reply brief denied.