Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
People v. Burke, Topel, Maniscalco
People v. Burke, Topel, Maniscalco, 267 N.Y. 571 (New York Court of Appeals 1935)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1935-04-30
- Topic
- general
Judgment affirmed; no opinion. *572 Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Crouch and Loughran, JJ. Not sitting: Finch, J. Crane, Ch. J., dissents in the following memorandum, in which Hubbs, J., concurs: Crane, Ch. J.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Burke, Topel, Maniscalco. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 16 opinions
Judgment affirmed; no opinion.
*572 Concur: Lehman, O’Brien, Crouch and Loughran, JJ. Not sitting: Finch, J. Crane, Ch. J., dissents in the following memorandum, in which Hubbs, J., concurs: Crane, Ch. J. (dissenting). For men and women to appear naked in a gymnasium, to which admittance is gained by the payment of a fee, in my judgment “ openly outrages public decency,” and is a violation of sections 43, 1140 and 1530 of the Penal Law. I dissent and vote for the affirmance of the convictions of these defendants.