Opinion · North Dakota Supreme Court
Interest of W.E.
Int. of W.E., No. 20000078, UP896696 (N.D. Dec. 7, 2000)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- North Dakota Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- North Dakota
- Date
- 2000-12-07
- Topic
- general
Filed 12/7/00 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2000 ND 113 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Leslie Allen Lunstad, Defendant and Appellant No. 20000113 Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Burt L. Riskedahl, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Interest of W.E.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
Filed 12/7/00 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Leslie Allen Lunstad, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20000113
Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Burt L. Riskedahl, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd Ronald Erickson, Assistant State’s Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for plaintiff and appellee.
Robert Wade Martin, P.O. Box 2324, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2324, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Lunstad
No. 20000113
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Leslie Allen Lunstad appealed from a judgment of conviction, entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of surreptitious intrusion in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-03.1. On appeal, Lunstad asserts there is not substantial evidence to support the jury verdict and the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the prosecution to exceed the permissible scope of closing argument. The judgment of conviction is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom