Opinion · Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Martinez v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.

Martinez v. Marine Transp. Lines, Inc., 78 N.Y.S.2d 3 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 1948)

Type
Opinion
Court
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1948-03-01
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The defendant, general agent of the United States, was not liable to plaintiff either for unearned wages or *653maintenance and cure (Shilman v. United States of America, 164 F. 2d 649). Comity requires this court to follow the Circuit Court decision. The judgment should he reversed, with $20 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Martinez v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
MARTINEZv.MARINE TRANSPORT LINES,191 Misc. 652(1948)
78 N.Y.S.2d 3
FRANCISCO MARTINEZ, Respondent-Appellant,v.MARINE TRANSPORT LINES, INC.,
Appellant-Respondent.fn*
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
March 1, 1948.
Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, WATSON, J.
Louis R. HaroldsandWilliam L. Standardfor respondent appellant.Matthew L. DanaharandVernon S. Jonesfor appellant-respondent.
Per Curiam.
The defendant, general agent of the United States, was not liable to plaintiff either for unearned wages orPage 653maintenance and cure (Shilmanv.United States of America,164 F.2d 649). Comity requires this court to follow the Circuit Court decision.

The judgment should be reversed, with $20 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

HAMMER, EDER and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
  1. Cf.Healeyv.Spragus S.S. Co.,191 Misc. 164. — [REP. ↩