Opinion · Nylaw New York

MILSTEIN v. CITY OF TROY, 272 App. Div. 625 (1947)

BEVERLY E. MILSTEIN, an Infant, by IDA v. MILSTEIN, Her Guardian ad litem,et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents v. CITY OF TROY, Defendant.CITY OF TROY, Third Party Plaintiff, Appellant, v. JOSEPH A. MILSTEIN,Third Party Defendant, Respondent., 74 N.Y.S.2d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1947)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1947-11-12
Topic
general

MILSTEIN v. CITY OF TROY, 272 App. Div. 625 (1947) 74 N.Y.S.2d 892 BEVERLY E. MILSTEIN, an Infant, by IDA V. MILSTEIN, Her Guardian ad litem,et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MILSTEIN v. CITY OF TROY, 272 App. Div. 625 (1947). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MILSTEINv.CITY OF TROY,272 App. Div. 625(1947)
74 N.Y.S.2d 892
BEVERLY E. MILSTEIN, an Infant, by IDA V. MILSTEIN, Her Guardian ad litem,
et al., Plaintiffs-Respondentsv.CITY OF TROY, Defendant.
CITY OF TROY, Third Party Plaintiff, Appellant,v.JOSEPH A. MILSTEIN,
Third Party Defendant, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
November 12, 1947.
Appeal from Supreme Court, Rensselaer County, SCHIRICK, J.
Frederick C. Filley, Corporation Counseland attorney (JohnH. Broderickof counsel) for defendant and third party plaintiff, appellant.Dugan, Barkhuff Dugan, attorneys (Kenneth J. Duganof counsel, for third party defendant, respondent.Medwin Weiss, attorneys for plaintiffs-respondents.
HILL, P.J.
Appeal by the City of Troy, "defendant and third party plaintiff" from an order which dismissed its third party complaint against Joseph A. Milstein, "third party defendant." The City of Troy owns and operates an airport. The third party defendant owner and operator of an airplane landed at the airport. He did not turn off thePage 626motor, the propeller blades continued to revolve, injuring his daughter Beverly E. Milstein, eleven-years old who approached the plane. She, by her mother as guardian ad litem, has brought an action against the City of Troy to recover for damages which it is alleged she sustained. The city has answered and the action between the original parties is at issue, but not tried. The city, as a third party plaintiff, has served a summons and complaint upon the father of the infant plaintiff, alleging that it will be entitled to indemnification from him for any damages which it may hereafter be required to pay to the plaintiff, and demands judgment "that the ultimate rights of it and the third party defendant between themselves be determined in this action, and that the third party plaintiff have judgment against the third party defendant for any sum or sums which may be recovered against it by the said Beverly E. Milstein or Ida V. Milstein, or either of them, in the said action instituted by them against the third party plaintiff, as defendant".

The city, appellant, argues thatFoxv.Western New YorkMotor Lines, Inc.(257 N.Y. 305) does not apply, because the father, third party defendant, alone was actively negligent, and if there was any negligence by the City of Troy in failing to police and supervise the airport to prevent persons from approaching the plane, it was secondary and inactive. That althoughSorrentinov.Sorrentino(248 N.Y. 626) would deny the unemancipated daughter a right to recover against her father for his active wrong, the relation between the city and the father, third parties, gives rise to an obligation on behalf of the father to respond to the city for damages, citingSchubertv.Schubert Wagon Co.(249 N.Y. 253,256-257) where a husband, employee of a corporation injured his wife while negligently driving its motor truck. The wife being denied a right of action against the husband (Allenv.Allen,246 N.Y. 571), it was decided in theSchubertcase that the inhibition did not protect the employer.

Assuming without deciding that appellant city would have a cause of action for recoupment for damages paid to the plaintiff, this action for indemnity is premature, as a right to recover does not accrue until payment has been made by the city. (Dunnv.Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.,175 N.Y. 214;Sattav.City ofNew York,272 App. Div. 782.)

All concur.

Order affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements.Page 627