Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF RAMIREZ v. COLON, 230 A.D.2d 875 [2d Dept 1996]

In the Matter of JULIO C. RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. LUZ C. COLON et al.,Respondents., 646 N.Y.S.2d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1996)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1996-08-20
Topic: general

MATTER OF RAMIREZ v. COLON, 230 A.D.2d 875 [2d Dept 1996] 646 N.Y.S.2d 637 In the Matter of JULIO C. RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. LUZ C. COLON et al.,Respondents.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF RAMIREZ v. COLON, 230 A.D.2d 875 [2d Dept 1996]. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF RAMIREZ v. COLON,230 A.D.2d 875[2d Dept 1996]

646 N.Y.S.2d 637

In the Matter of JULIO C. RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. LUZ C. COLON et al.,

Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

August 20, 1996

In a proceeding to validate a petition designating Julio C. Ramirez as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 10, 1996, for the nominations of the Republican, Conservative, and Freedom parties as their candidate for the public office of Member of the New York State Senate for the 16th Senate District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonshein, J.), dated August 5, 1996, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We do not agree with the petitioner's estoppel argument(see,Matter of Parkview Assocs. v City of New York,71 N.Y.2d 274;Kubiniec v Mahoney,97 A.D.2d 981). Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Altman, JJ., concur.